How is thor in 3d

When you put on a pair of 3D glasses, you're basically putting a filter between yourself and the screen. It's like wearing sunglasses in a movie theater. There are ways to compensate for this using the theater's projector, but many theaters don't bother, and most good 3D movies find ways to compensate for this on their own.

Ideally 3D should only be used on movies containing bright, sharply defined pictures and Thor is exactly that kind of film. Even with those filters in front of your eyes blocking out some of the visible light emissions, Thor remains bright, vibrant, and lively to look at throughout. It probably helps that portions of the film, like the Asgard sequences, are largely computer generated.

But even live action scenes on Earth look consistently vibrant. Take off your 3D glasses while you're watching a good 3D movie, and the picture in front of you will become a blur.

The best way to explain this is that the blurrier the image is without your glasses on, the more fully utilized most of the 3D on screen will be. To test that I took my glasses off periodically throughout Thor , and unfortunately only noticed a minimal difference. Really great 3D movies vary the depth of the picture, depending on what's happening on screen. So at times the picture separation becomes greater than at others. But I never noticed any difference in the depth of 3D effects being used.

In truth, the actual blurring without my glasses was fairly minimal. Thor is being projected in 3D, but not all that much 3D.

It doesn't seem committed to it, except as something to put on the marquee in order to justify charging more for tickets. Badly implemented 3D can cause headaches, dizziness, and nausea in even the most hardy moviegoers. The good and bad news when it comes to Thor is that because it doesn't really seem all that committed to wowing anyone with its 3D effects, it's not really going to do anything to make you sick either.

Headaches aren't likely to be a problem, since those are most often caused by the eyestrain of looking at dim 3D images and Thor , though it doesn't really get anything else about 3D right, is projected in a way that's bright and vibrant on screen. Bottom line here, you may not enjoy the 3D but at least it's not going to make you sick.

Originally intended as a test to determine whether The Avengers would be shot in 3D, it resulted in Kevin Feige being discouraged from the process entirely moving forward. It was so difficult, the book described it as "being an abysmal experience. The scene in question was the very same that fans eventually saw, which is why it might surprise some people to hear how difficult it was. However, despite the seeming simplicity of the scene, the decision to shoot it with 3D cameras caused the filming process to be unnecessarily long.

Jeremy Latcham, an executive producer on The Avengers , described the tedious shoot. He said, "It took so long to change a lens that it was truly awful. Director Taika Waititi infuses the film with a very bright color scheme that borders on neon at some points.

These bright colors help keep the film from ever feeling dark, even when viewing through the necessary filter of a pair of 3D glasses. There was only the briefest moment where things were so dark as to be difficult to make out, but the moment was so brief that it's not worth reducing the points here.

When you remove your 3D glasses during the film you'll get a minor case of double vision as the two parts of the three-dimensional image slightly offset each other.

The more depth the frame is trying to create, the more blurry the image will be without your glasses. This even extends to simple scenes where they likely could have gotten away with doing less, but took the time to do more.

Motion sickness is a significant issue for some people when it comes to viewing 3D. Luckily, the camera behaves itself for the most part throughout Thor: Ragnarok and never gets so out of control that you're likely to want to lose your popcorn. Not everybody reacts identically and your mileage may vary, but if you're usually ok with 3D, you'll be ok with it here. Motion sickness is usually exacerbated by a fast moving camera during heavy 3D sections, and you won't find anything like that in Ragnarok.

Thor: Ragnarok is a pretty good movie, even among the generally fun Marvel Cinematic Universe. Odds are you're already going to go see it. The 3D side of the film is not perfect, but it does everything well, and doesn't do anything poorly.

It's also quite fun, so if you're willing to spend the extra money, you probably won't be disappointed in it. If you don't, you won't really be missing the high point of the art form, but you will miss some cool effects that add, well, depth to the experience as a whole. Armchair Imagineer. Epcot Stan.